Solidarité internationale et luttes sociales en Afrique subsaharienne |
Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens
|
Derniers articles : Les défenseurs des droits de l’Homme à nouveau pris pour cible - - 19 octobre 2007 L’escalade de la violence dans le Nord-Kivu accentue le risque de massacres à caractère ethnique - - 10 octobre 2007 L’examen des contrats miniers du Congo entaché par un manque de transparence - - 1er octobre 2007 Pour que les Congolais profitent des ressources minières de leur pays - 28 septembre 2007 Déclaration de la société civile de RDC sur les APE - 20 septembre 2007 la Banque mondiale finance une entreprise impliquée dans l’exploitation illégale de la forêt - - 30 août 2007 La Banque Européenne d’Investissement (BEI) approuve un prêt pour un projet minier très contesté au Congo - - 23 juillet 2007 Hold Peacekeepers Accountable for Congo Smuggling - - 23 July 2007 1ère édition du forum social congolais : les engagements des mouvements sociaux - 17 juillet 2007 Les victimes du massacre de Kilwa privées de justice - 17 juillet 2007 Victims of Kilwa massacre denied justice by Congolese military court - 17 July 2007 Déclaration de la Plate-forme Dette et Développement (P.D.D) sur la récupération des avoirs de la R.D. Congo - 12 juillet 2007 Voir également : Environnement : Déforestation alarmante, tragique inaction ! Afrique Centrale : La présidence allemande de l’UE peut faire la différence Afrique Centrale : Déclaration sur les défenseurs des Droits de l’Homme de la région des Grands Lacs Pillage des ressources : Diamond trade still at risk from conflict diamonds Pillage des ressources : Open Statement to the Security Council details the critical need for the maintenance of sanctions on Liberian diamonds and renewal and extension of the mandate of MONUC Site(s) web : Societecivile.cd : http://www.societecivile.cd
Forum Social Congolais :http://www.forum-social-rdc.org/
Ligue Congolaise de lutte contre la Corruption :Forêts du Congo - Greenpeace : Journaliste En Danger - Afrique Centrale : Dernier(s) document(s) : Une part équitable pour le Congo! - Les partenariats public-privé dans le secteur minier en RDC : facteurs de développement, de bonne gouvernance et de lutte contre la corruption ? - 13 March 2007 (PDF - 924.6 kb) La dette extérieure et le financement du développement de la RD Congo - Défis et perspectives pour le nouveau gouvernement démocratiquement élu - par Arnaud Zacharie, CNCD - 24 February 2007 (PDF - 423 kb) Une corruption profonde : Fraude, abus et exploitation dans les mines de cuivre et de cobalt du Katanga - Un rapport de - 5 July 2006 (PDF - 2.8 Mb) La réforme du secteur du diamant en RDC - Un rapport de - 14 June 2006 (PDF - 802.7 kb) L’État contre le peuple - La gouvernance, l’exploitation minière et le régime transitoire en République Démocratique du Congo - Un rapport de l’Institut néerlandais pour l’Afrique australe (NiZA) - 11 May 2006 (PDF - 1.6 Mb) The State vs. the people - Governance, mining and the transitional regime in the Democratic Republic of Congo - A report by Fatal Transactions - 27 March 2006 (PDF - 2.7 Mb) La paix sous tension : dangereux et illicite commerce de la cassitérite dans l’Est de la RDC - Un rapport de - 2 July 2005 (PDF - 2.1 Mb) Le Fléau de l’or - Un rapport d’Human Rights Watch - 2 June 2005 (PDF - 4.1 Mb) |
Review of Congo mining contracts marred by lack of transparency 1 October 2007 - The integrity of a governmental review of mining contracts in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is being undermined by a lack of transparency and pressure to rush through the process as fast as possible, Global Witness said in a new briefing published today. Global Witness is calling on the government to publish the contracts, as well as the criteria for their evaluation, and to extend the period available for the review. The Global Witness briefing, entitled "The Congolese mining sector in the balance", provides a critique of the process of the review since its inception. It highlights several main concerns: a lack of transparency, clarity and public information, affecting almost every aspect of the review. intense pressure to complete the review within an unrealistic time-frame, calling into question its methodology. inadequate safeguards to protect the independence of the review. limited involvement of civil society and lack of public consultation. Global Witness initially welcomed the DRC government’s decision to launch a review of mining contracts in April 2007. [1] For decades, the DRC’s vast mineral wealth, which includes diamonds, gold, copper and cobalt, has been exploited illegally or has been tied up in opaque deals which have provided huge profits for multinational companies and individual politicians, but contributed little or nothing to the country’s development. "This initiative could have marked a turning point by restoring transparency, fairness and trust in the mining sector," said Patrick Alley, Director of Global Witness. "It could also provide an effective tool with which to rebuild confidence among civil society, economic operators, investors and donors. Instead, the government is rushing the whole process through so fast that one has to question the thoroughness and objectivity of the exercise." The Commission set up to carry out the review was given just three months to analyse more than 60 contracts. Although the period has been slightly extended, the government is still exerting pressure on the Commission, which is expected to submit its report to the Minister of Mines in October. "This apparent disregard for the care and attention to detail required for a thorough review of contracts will affect both the quality and the outcome of the process," said Patrick Alley. "Huge sums of money are tied up in these contracts which could represent a valuable opportunity to develop the country’s economy and reduce poverty. Yet the government does not appear to be treating the matter with the seriousness it deserves." Global Witness warned that if the process is perceived as biased, it will be labelled as "business as usual" in the context of extensive corruption in the mining sector. Not only will the Commission’s efforts then have been wasted, but popular disillusionment could lead to increased tension and instability in mining areas. The government has not published the contracts under review (although it has made them available to certain organisations), nor has it published the criteria against which the contracts are to be evaluated. There is also a lack of information about how the contracts are being prioritised, since not all of them can be analysed in detail in the time available. Global Witness also expressed concern about the limited involvement of Congolese civil society and the lack of consultation with the general public. The Congolese population have been the main victims of the grave mismanagement of natural resources in the DRC. Yet the government has not sought out their views as part of the process, even though mining operations have a direct impact on the lives of millions of Congolese men and women. Global Witness’s recommendations to the DRC government include: the publication of the terms of reference and criteria for the review, a full and definitive list of the contracts under review and the contracts themselves. a further extension of the period available for the review, if necessary by several months, and the publication of a revised timetable which allows sufficient time to solicit a broad range of views. the creation of an independent monitoring mechanism which would oversee the Commission’s work and ensure that its final report is based on a fair, independent and thorough assessment of the contracts. The monitoring body, which could include members of civil society, parliamentarians and international legal experts, could also oversee the implementation of the Commission’s recommendations. The full Global Witness briefing, The Congolese mining sector in the balance, is available at For further information, please contact Carina Tertsakian on +44 207 561 6372. [1] See Global Witness press release "Congolese government should ensure transparency and independent oversight in mining contract review", 17 May 2007. |
Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens |
Copyrights | 2022 | liberationafrique.org |