lib	ration afrique
Solidarité internationale et luttes sociales en Afrique subsaharienne
 

Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens
 
Enregistrer au format PDF   afficher une version imprimable de cet article

Agriculture - Accès à la terre - Souveraineté alimentaire


Landless People’s Movement - South Africa -



Abonnez-vous à la
lettre d'information
de Libération Afrique




Derniers articles :

Accélérer en plein désastre : quand les banques gèrent la crise alimentaire - - 27 janvier 2009
La Via Campesina organise sa cinquième conférence internationale - - 30 septembre 2008
Via Campesina is holding its Vth International Conference - - 30 September 2008
Des mesures urgentes doivent ê tre adoptées au Sommet mondial sur la sécurité alimentaire pour résoudre la crise - - 4 juin 2008
Aid is not enough to address food price crisis - - 28 April 2008
L’aide alimentaire ne peut pas être la seule réponse à la flambée des prix agricoles - - 28 avril 2008
Les révoltes de la faim dans les pays du Sud : l’aboutissement logique de choix économiques et politiques désastreux - - - 18 avril 2008
Une réponse à la crise mondiale des prix alimentaires : l’agriculture familiale durable peut nourrir le monde - - 14 février 2008
A response to the Global Food Prices Crisis: Sustainable family farming can feed the world - - 14 February 2008
Nous faisons partie de la solution pour le réchauffement global - - 8 décembre 2007
We are part of the solution to Global warming - - 8 décembre 2007
Déclaration de Nyéléni - 27 février 2007


Voir également :


Afrique du Sud : People’s Budget coalition response to the National Budget
Forums sociaux : Nous ne payerons pas la crise ! Que les riches la paient !
Luttes des femmes : Déclaration de l’Assemblée des Femmes
Cameroun : L’ACDIC dénonce les détournements des fonds destinés aux paysans au ministère de l’agriculture
Madagascar : Pétition : ″Affaire Daewoo″
Mali : Déclaration contre la privatisation de la filière coton de la CMDT du MSV
Burkina Faso : Nul ne peut s’arroger le droit d’utiliser les aliments comme armes contre les populations
OMC - AGOA - Commerce international : COSATU rejects new NAMA and Agricultural proposal presented on 25th July 2008
OMC - AGOA - Commerce international : Pour résoudre la crise alimentaire, l’OMC pousse vers toujours plus de libéralisation : de l’huile sur le feu !
Sommets du G8 : Challenge to the G8 Governments
Niger : Mémorandum de la Convergence Citoyenne
Forums sociaux : Déclaration de la 7ème édition du Forum des Peuples
Cameroun : Pour la souveraineté alimentaire du Cameroun
Burkina Faso : Déclaration Finale de la Deuxième édition du Forum Social du Burkina
Burkina Faso : Plate forme d’action de la coalition nationale contre la vie chère


Site(s) web :

Pambazuka News - Land and Land Rights :
Via Campesina :
Nyéléni 2007 - Forum pour la Souveraineté Alimentaire :
Collectif pour la défense des terres malgaches :
Confédération paysanne du Faso :
Conseil national de concertation et de coopération des ruraux (CNCR) - Sénégal :
Dakar Déclaration - Pour des politiques agricoles et commerciales solidaires :
GRAIN - Genetic Ressources Action International :
Kenya Land Alliance :
Réseau des organisations paysannes et des producteurs agricoles de l’Afrique de l’Ouest :
abc Burkina :


Dernier(s) document(s) :

L’accaparement des terres de rizières met en péril la souveraineté alimentaire de l’Afrique - Par Grain - 27 January 2009 (PDF - 62.2 kb)
Main basse sur les terres agricoles en pleine crise alimentaire et financière - Un rapport de GRAIN - 1 January 2009 (PDF - 181.8 kb)
Pour une politique agricole commune (PAC) favorable au développement - coordination SUD - 11 May 2008 (PDF - 76.6 kb)
La protection des marchés agricoles : un outil de développement - Un rapport de Coordination Sud - 1 December 2006 (PDF - 1.3 Mb)

Groups call for Action on 21 September
International day against monoculture tree plantations
Joint Release from World Rainforest Movement, Friends of the Earth International and Global Forest Coalition

19 September 2008


Large-scale monoculture tree plantations cause serious environmental, social and economic impacts on local communities. These impacts have been amply documented around the world, and include the depletion of water sources due to changes in the hydrological cycle; deterioration of rivers and streams; air and water pollution due to the use of pesticides and other agrochemicals; the displacement of entire communities when their land is occupied by plantations; violations of human, labour and environmental rights; differentiated impacts on women; the deterioration of cultural diversity; widespread violence; and the critical loss of biodiversity.

For that reason, NGOs, Indigenous Peoples’ Organisations and social movements all over the world will commemorate the International Day against Monoculture Tree Plantations this weekend by organizing actions, demonstrations, marches and sending out joint letters to express their concerns. [1]

Sandy Gauntlett of the Pacific Indigenous Peoples Environment Coalition, states:

"Tree plantations are not forests. A plantation is a highly uniform agricultural system that replaces natural ecosystems and their rich biodiversity. The trees planted are geared to the production of a single raw material, whether it is timber, pulp, rubber, palm oil or others. Nevertheless, international institutions like the FAO and the World Bank, as well as government agencies in countries like New Zealand, incorrectly define plantations as forests, despite abundant documentation which proves that the only thing they have in common is the presence of trees. By calling them forests, these institutions and governments help to impose and perpetuate an unsustainable monoculture plantation production model."

"Plantations form part of an industrial model for the production of abundant and cheap raw material that serves as an input for the economic growth of the industrialized countries. What the producer countries get are environmental degradation and rising poverty, which are the ‘externalized costs’ of this cheap raw material," stressed Simone Lovera of the Global Forest Coalition.

"On the lands currently occupied by plantations, there used to be or could be agricultural crops that would help ensure the people’s food sovereignty, managed by peasant communities. Or these communities and indigenous peoples could use the land for sustainable activities that would improve their quality of life, such as community forest management," added Isaac Rojas of Friends of the Earth International. [2]

The struggle waged by local communities against tree monocultures has become a part of daily life in countries around the world. It is a struggle that none of these communities asked for, but one that has been imposed on them. In Asia and the Pacific, local communities in Malaysia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea are fighting against oil palm plantations. In Africa, there are struggles against plantations that produce rubber, palm oil and wood pulp in Nigeria, Cameroon, Liberia, Swaziland and South Africa. And in Latin America, countries like Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Ecuador and Uruguay are suffering the impacts of “green deserts” of pine and eucalyptus trees, while Colombia is now facing the rapid expansion of palm oil plantations for agrofuel production, as are Venezuela and the countries of Central America.

To make matters worse, large-scale tree plantations are being promoted - falsely - as a solution for climate change. On the one hand, the European Parliament and other institutions are promoting the so-called second generation of biofuels [3] produced from wood, which would lead to the rapid and wide expansion of tree monocultures, including transgenic trees. [4] On the other hand, some southern countries view a potential fund under the Framework Convention on Climate Change as a possible source of financing for large tree plantations as carbon sinks to compensate for the loss of forests. As a result, mechanisms like REDD (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries) could be turned into a massive subsidy scheme for plantations.

"All ‘international days’ refer to problems of global importance that need the world’s attention. The expansion of large-scale tree monoculture plantations is one of these problems. That is why this 21 September will give greater visibility to the great many struggles being waged around the world and demonstrate the negative impacts of this model, and the world will have the opportunity to join in this struggle," explains Ricardo Carrere of the World Rainforest Movement (WRM).

"21 September is also the International Day of Peace, and this is what the people waging this struggle are fighting for: Peace, so that the communities affected can recover their way of life in harmony with Nature and with other people." he added.

"This 21 September, we will also celebrate the fertile resistance that is growing in so many communities every day of the year, in pursuit of a world with justice and without these destructive plantations."




[1] All of these impacts have been documented in many publications, case studies and declarations made by the communities themselves. For more information see the World Rainforest Movement website: http:://www.wrm.org.uy.

[2] Community forest management has been documented as a sustainable livelihood initiative by Friends of the Earth International. For more information see their website: http://www.foei.org.

[3] For a more thorough analysis of the problems associated with agrofuel plantations see the Global Forest Coalition website at: http://www.globalforestcoalition.org.

[4] More information on transgenic trees is available at http://www.wrm.org.uy, http://www.foei.org, http://www.globalforestcoalition.org.





Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens
Copyrights | 2022 | liberationafrique.org