lib	ration afrique
Solidarité internationale et luttes sociales en Afrique subsaharienne
 

Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens
 
Enregistrer au format PDF   afficher une version imprimable de cet article

OGM


Consumers say NO to GMOs - Consumers International Campaign



Abonnez-vous à la
lettre d'information
de Libération Afrique




Derniers articles :

Contaminated U.S. Rice Must Be Recalled From Africa - - - 25 November 2006
No Gateway to Africa’s Sorghum - - 10 July 2006
Groups in Africa, Latin America condemn World Bank biosafety projects - - - 26 June 2006
Ten Years of Genetically Modified Crops Fail to Deliver Benefits to Africa - - - 10 January 2006
Déclaration de Nairobi sur les OGM dans l’agriculture africaine - - 1er décembre 2005
Ecowas, Stop GMOs Now - - 1 July 2005
Statement by civil-society on biotech ECOWAS conference - 24 June 2005
FoE-Africa/TWN conference on GMOS and Africa - - - 24 April 2005
GMOs will not solve hunger, but will make it worse - 16 July 2004
FAO unashamedly biased towards GMOs - - 17 June 2004
La FAO prend sans complexe le parti des OGM - - 17 juin 2004
Consumers International joins African NGOs in GM food aid protest - - 5 May 2004


Voir également :


Forum social mondial de Dakar - février 2011 : Déclaration de l’assemblée des mouvements sociaux
Luttes des femmes : Déclaration de l’Assemblée des Femmes
Agriculture - Accès à la terre - Souveraineté alimentaire : International day against monoculture tree plantations
Afrique du Sud : GM potato “of no use” in SA
Burkina Faso : Nul ne peut s’arroger le droit d’utiliser les aliments comme armes contre les populations
Burkina Faso : Déclaration de la la COPAGEN Burkina sur l’introduction des OGM et la diffusion de la culture du coton transgénique au Burkina
Afrique du Sud : Biowatch Court Ruling: Gross Miscarriage of Environmental Justice
Afrique du Sud : New GM Experiments in South Africa
Afrique du Sud : Africa’s Sorghum Saved: Applause for Second GM Sorghum Rejection
Agriculture - Accès à la terre - Souveraineté alimentaire : Nyéléni 2007 - Forum pour la Souveraineté Alimentaire
Environnement - lutte contre le changement climatique : Regional Conference On Biosafety
Afrique du Sud : We want the right to choose safe food now!
Nigeria : Communique of One Day National Workshop on Biosafety and the People Abuja
Cameroun : La société civile nationale dit non aux OGM
Afrique du Sud : Bt cotton in Makhathini: the success story that never was


Site(s) web :

GRAIN - Genetic Ressources Action International :
Consumers International - Africa Office :
African Centre for Biosafety :
Biowatch South Africa :
Consumers International - Africa Office :
Earth Life Africa :
Nyéléni 2007 - Forum pour la Souveraineté Alimentaire :


Dernier(s) document(s) :

Who benefits from gm crops? feeding the biotech giants, not the world’s poor - By Friends of the Earth International - 10 February 2009 (PDF - 4.4 Mb)
West Africa and the biotech push - ECOWAS Ministerial Conference on Biotechnology - FoE Africa Briefing Paper - 15 March 2007 (PDF - 63.3 kb)
L’USAID, ou comment faire pour que le monde ait faim de cultures génétiquement modifiées - GRAIN Briefing - 7 July 2005 (PDF - 943.1 kb)
USAid: Making the World Hungry for GM Crops - GRAIN Briefing - April 2005 (PDF - 575.9 kb)
Le coton Bt à la porte de l’Afrique de l’Ouest : Il faut agir ! - Dossier de recherches publié par GRAIN - 25 March 2005 (PDF - 429.6 kb)

First GMO seed scandal in Africa: South Africa contaminates the continent

29 February 2008
- http://www.biosafetyafrica.net/


Seed maize from South Africa, claiming to be pure, has been found to be contaminated with genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The South African branch of US seed giant Pioneer Hi-Bred recently exported contaminated maize seeds to unsuspecting Kenyan farmers.

The maize seeds are contaminated with a genetically engineered variety-MON810- belonging to Monsanto that has not been approved in Kenya. GM maize MON 810 contains a novel gene that is considered unsafe and banned in several European countries.

The contamination of Kenyan seeds comes on the eve of a UN meeting that is tasked with developing internationally liability rules for genetically engineered products.

The contamination was detected by Greenpeace International, who, in cooperation with a coalition of several environmental and farmers’ organisations in Kenya, commissioned tests of 19 different seed varieties that were bought in seed stores from key maize producing areas across the country. The tests, conducted by an independent European laboratory, revealed that Pioneer’s seed maize PHB 30V53, sold in the Eldoret region of Kenya, is contaminated with MON 810 maize, a variant that is genetically engineered to be insect resistant.

We call on all African national regulatory agencies to ban any import of seeds from companies that do not guarantee clean seeds that are free from genetic contamination,” insists Mariam Mayet director of African Centre for Biosafety (ACB), “Kenya now needs a strong biosafety bill that puts farmers’ and consumer rights first, and we need mandatory international rules that ensure that polluters must pay for genetic contamination.”

Some blame for this seed contamination scandal must also lie at the door of the South African government who has allowed the export of unapproved maize in the first place, she contends. “Maize is the most important staple crop in Kenya. Farmers and consumers in all countries, rich and poor, have the right to untainted, safe seeds and food.

Note:

From 12-19 March, in Cartagena, Colombia, governments will continue to negotiate international rules on liability for damages caused by GMOs. These negotiations take place under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Some developed countries such as the United States, Japan and New Zealand are opposing a global agreement on GMO liability. The continuing threats to developing country agriculture posed by GMO contamination, as evidenced by this latest contamination scandal, demonstrate the need for legally binding, global rules that ensure that polluters pay if anything goes wrong with genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

In February 2008 the French government decided to ban the cultivation of Monsanto’s maize MON 810. The French ban is based on several environmental concerns, such as the impossibility to prevent the dissemination of GM maize into the environment and the possibility of toxic effects on non target organisms, such as earthworms. Besides France five other EU member states (Austria, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Poland) have banned the commercial growing of GM maize MON 810 on the basis of environmental and health concerns .




For further information, contact Mariam Mayet of the AFRICAN CENTRE FOR BIOSAFETY on 083 269 4309, Suite 3, 12 Clamart Street, Richmond, 2192 South Africa

Issued on behalf of the African Centre for Biodiversity by Michelle Nel on 011 615 4432 or 083 208 7902





Accueil | Qui sommes nous ? | Actualité | Dossiers | Pays | Liens
Copyrights | 2022 | liberationafrique.org